Fish, halibut, cooked, with skin (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, halibut, cooked, with skin (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, halibut, cooked, with skin (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 113 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Protein | 22.13 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, halibut, cooked, with skin (Alaska Native) has 403% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.73 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, halibut, cooked, with skin (Alaska Native) has 42% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 86 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, halibut, cooked, with skin (Alaska Native) has 1129% more |
| Calcium | 33 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, halibut, cooked, with skin (Alaska Native) has 94% more |
| Iron | 0.36 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Potassium | 501 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, halibut, cooked, with skin (Alaska Native) has 191% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.