Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 109 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 9% more |
| Protein | 22.64 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat has 415% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.36 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat has 986% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat has 6% more |
| Iron | 0.41 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 72% more |
| Potassium | 560 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, lingcod, cooked, dry heat has 226% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.