Fish, lingcod, liver (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Fish, lingcod, liver (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Fish, lingcod, liver (Alaska Native) Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 424 kcal 90 kcal Fish, lingcod, liver (Alaska Native) has 371% more
Protein 5.6 g 2.01 g Fish, lingcod, liver (Alaska Native) has 179% more
Carbs 6 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more
Fat 42 g 0.15 g Fish, lingcod, liver (Alaska Native) has 27900% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 0 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Calcium 5 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more
Iron 1 mg 0.69 mg Fish, lingcod, liver (Alaska Native) has 45% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 0 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.