Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 141 kcal 90 kcal Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone has 57% more
Protein 21.43 g 2.01 g Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone has 966% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 5.5 g 0.15 g Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone has 3567% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 391 mg 36 mg Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone has 986% more
Calcium 249 mg 38 mg Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone has 555% more
Iron 0.7 mg 0.69 mg Fish, salmon, chum, canned, drained solids with bone has 1% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 300 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.