Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone
5 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 131% more |
| Protein | 21.43 g ★ | 3.15 g | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 580% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 3.25 g ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 69% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 75 mg | 43 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 74% more |
| Calcium | 249 mg ★ | 113 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 120% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 2233% more |
| Potassium | 300 mg ★ | 132 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 127% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.