Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 18% more |
| Protein | 21.43 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 387% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 186% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 75 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 971% more |
| Calcium | 249 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 1365% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Potassium | 300 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.