Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 154 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat has 71% more |
| Protein | 25.82 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat has 1185% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.83 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat has 3120% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 64 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat has 78% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 0.71 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat has 3% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 550 mg ★ | 475 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.