Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 378 kcal 90 kcal Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) has 320% more
Protein 62.09 g 2.01 g Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) has 2989% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 14.38 g 0.15 g Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) has 9487% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 190 mg 36 mg Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) has 428% more
Calcium 155 mg 38 mg Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) has 308% more
Iron 2.2 mg 0.69 mg Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) has 219% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 910 mg 475 mg Fish, salmon, chum, dried (Alaska Native) has 92% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.