Fish, Salmon, Chum, raw (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, Salmon, Chum, raw (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, Salmon, Chum, raw (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 3% more |
| Protein | 20.69 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, Salmon, Chum, raw (Alaska Native) has 370% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.67 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, Salmon, Chum, raw (Alaska Native) has 91% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, Salmon, Chum, raw (Alaska Native) has 743% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 59% more |
| Iron | 0.56 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 62% more |
| Potassium | 370 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, Salmon, Chum, raw (Alaska Native) has 115% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.