Fish, salmon, chum, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, chum, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, chum, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 120 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Equal |
| Protein | 20.14 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, salmon, chum, raw has 358% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.77 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, raw has 96% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, raw has 614% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 0.55 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 63% more |
| Potassium | 429 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, raw has 149% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.