Fish, salmon, chum, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, chum, raw
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, chum, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 120 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, raw has 33% more |
| Protein | 20.14 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, salmon, chum, raw has 902% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.77 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, raw has 2413% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, raw has 39% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.55 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 429 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.