Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 266 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 196% more |
| Protein | 30.7 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 1427% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 15.9 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 10500% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 38 mg ★ | 38 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 1.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 146% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.