Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 187 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 56% more |
| Protein | 20.25 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 360% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 11.73 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 511% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 48 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 586% more |
| Calcium | 42 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 147% more |
| Iron | 0.79 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Potassium | 370 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 115% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.