Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 187 kcal 90 kcal Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 108% more
Protein 20.25 g 2.01 g Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 907% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 11.73 g 0.15 g Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 7720% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 48 mg 36 mg Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 33% more
Calcium 42 mg 38 mg Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 11% more
Iron 0.79 mg 0.69 mg Fish, salmon, king (chinook), raw (Alaska Native) has 14% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 370 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.