Fish, salmon, king, chinook, smoked and canned (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, king, chinook, smoked and canned (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, smoked and canned (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 150 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, smoked and canned (Alaska Native) has 67% more |
| Protein | 23.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, smoked and canned (Alaska Native) has 1054% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, smoked and canned (Alaska Native) has 3833% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 60 mg ★ | 38 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, smoked and canned (Alaska Native) has 58% more |
| Iron | 1.8 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, smoked and canned (Alaska Native) has 161% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.