Fish, salmon, king, with skin, kippered, (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Fish, salmon, king, with skin, kippered, (Alaska Native)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Fish, salmon, king, with skin, kippered, (Alaska Native) Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 209 kcal 90 kcal Fish, salmon, king, with skin, kippered, (Alaska Native) has 132% more
Protein 23.19 g 2.01 g Fish, salmon, king, with skin, kippered, (Alaska Native) has 1054% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 12.95 g 0.15 g Fish, salmon, king, with skin, kippered, (Alaska Native) has 8533% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 870 mg 36 mg Fish, salmon, king, with skin, kippered, (Alaska Native) has 2317% more
Calcium 55 mg 38 mg Fish, salmon, king, with skin, kippered, (Alaska Native) has 45% more
Iron 0.55 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 390 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.