Grapefruit, raw, white, California vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Grapefruit, raw, white, California
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Grapefruit, raw, white, California | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 37 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
| Protein | 0.88 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Carbs | 9.09 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.08 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Vitamin C | 33.3 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Grapefruit, raw, white, California has 70% more |
| Potassium | 143 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.