Grapes, canned, thompson seedless, water pack, solids and liquids vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Grapes, canned, thompson seedless, water pack, solids and liquids
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Grapes, canned, thompson seedless, water pack, solids and liquids Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 40 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more
Protein 0.5 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more
Carbs 10.3 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more
Fat 0.11 g 0.15 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more
Fiber 0.6 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more
Sugar 9.7 g 6.48 g Grapes, canned, thompson seedless, water pack, solids and liquids has 50% more
Sodium 6 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more
Calcium 10 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more
Iron 0.98 mg 0.69 mg Grapes, canned, thompson seedless, water pack, solids and liquids has 42% more
Vitamin C 1 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more
Potassium 107 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.