Grapes, muscadine, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Grapes, muscadine, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Grapes, muscadine, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 57 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Protein | 0.81 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
| Carbs | 13.93 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fat | 0.47 g | 0.15 g ★ | Grapes, muscadine, raw has 213% more |
| Fiber | 3.9 g ★ | 3.3 g | Grapes, muscadine, raw has 18% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 37 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Iron | 0.26 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Vitamin C | 6.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Potassium | 203 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.