Groundcherries, (cape-gooseberries or poha), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Groundcherries, (cape-gooseberries or poha), raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Groundcherries, (cape-gooseberries or poha), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 53 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Carbs | 11.2 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.15 g ★ | Groundcherries, (cape-gooseberries or poha), raw has 367% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 1 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Groundcherries, (cape-gooseberries or poha), raw has 45% more |
| Vitamin C | 11 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.