KFC, Coleslaw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
KFC, Coleslaw
5 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
6 wins
| Nutrient | KFC, Coleslaw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 144 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 13% more |
| Protein | 0.91 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 97% more |
| Carbs | 15.65 g ★ | 0 g | KFC, Coleslaw has 0% more |
| Fat | 8.64 g | 3.57 g ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 142% more |
| Fiber | 2 g ★ | 0 g | KFC, Coleslaw has 0% more |
| Sugar | 13.54 g | 0 g ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 0% more |
| Sodium | 189 mg | 74 mg ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 155% more |
| Calcium | 28 mg ★ | 15 mg | KFC, Coleslaw has 87% more |
| Iron | 0.21 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 80% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | KFC, Coleslaw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 140 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.