KFC, Coleslaw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
KFC, Coleslaw
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
| Nutrient | KFC, Coleslaw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 144 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 6% more |
| Protein | 0.91 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 96% more |
| Carbs | 15.65 g ★ | 0 g | KFC, Coleslaw has 0% more |
| Fat | 8.64 g | 5.28 g ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 64% more |
| Fiber | 2 g ★ | 0 g | KFC, Coleslaw has 0% more |
| Sugar | 13.54 g | 0 g ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 0% more |
| Sodium | 189 mg | 90 mg ★ | KFC, Coleslaw has 110% more |
| Calcium | 28 mg ★ | 8 mg | KFC, Coleslaw has 250% more |
| Iron | 0.21 mg | 0.45 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 53% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | KFC, Coleslaw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 140 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.