Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, raw vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, raw
4 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, raw | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 122 kcal ★ | 147 kcal | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 17% more |
| Protein | 22.05 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Fat | 3.77 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, raw has 81% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 17% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
| Iron | 1.37 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, raw has 93% more |
| Potassium | 309 mg ★ | 249 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, raw has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.