Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 586 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 299% more |
| Protein | 9.72 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 68% more |
| Fat | 60.39 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 2803% more |
| Sodium | 35 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 65% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg ★ | 9 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 200% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 96% more |
| Potassium | 87 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.