Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw vs Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw
1 wins
🏆
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 640 kcal | 246 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 160% more |
| Protein | 6.92 g | 24.04 g ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 71% more |
| Fat | 67.63 g | 15.94 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 324% more |
| Sodium | 22 mg ★ | 83 mg | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 73% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg | 26 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 12% more |
| Iron | 1.14 mg | 2.59 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 56% more |
| Potassium | 51 mg | 335 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 85% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.