Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked vs Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 305 kcal | 246 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 24% more |
| Protein | 24.42 g ★ | 24.04 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 2% more |
| Fat | 22.26 g | 15.94 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 40% more |
| Sodium | 46 mg ★ | 83 mg | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 45% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 26 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 35% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg | 2.59 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 19% more |
| Potassium | 162 mg | 335 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 52% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.