Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 277 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 88% more |
| Protein | 16.74 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 44% more |
| Fat | 22.74 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 993% more |
| Sodium | 39 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 61% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg ★ | 9 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 44% more |
| Iron | 1.49 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 110% more |
| Potassium | 136 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.