Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 206 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 40% more |
| Protein | 29.59 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 2% more |
| Fat | 8.86 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 326% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 49% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg ★ | 9 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 44% more |
| Iron | 2.35 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 231% more |
| Potassium | 188 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.