Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted vs Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted
4 wins
🏆
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 246 kcal ★ | 246 kcal | Equal |
| Protein | 24.81 g ★ | 24.04 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 3% more |
| Fat | 15.56 g ★ | 15.94 g | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 2% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg ★ | 83 mg | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 48% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 26 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 62% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg | 2.59 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 19% more |
| Potassium | 167 mg | 335 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.