Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 246 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 67% more |
| Protein | 24.81 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 18% more |
| Fat | 15.56 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 648% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 57% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg ★ | 9 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 11% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 196% more |
| Potassium | 167 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.