Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 234 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted has 59% more |
| Protein | 25.34 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 16% more |
| Fat | 13.95 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted has 571% more |
| Sodium | 44 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 56% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg ★ | 9 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 2.13 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted has 200% more |
| Potassium | 170 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.