Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 201 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw has 37% more |
| Protein | 18.76 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 38% more |
| Fat | 13.37 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw has 543% more |
| Sodium | 41 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 59% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
| Iron | 1.6 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw has 125% more |
| Potassium | 160 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.