Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted
2 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 181 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 23% more |
| Protein | 27.68 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 8% more |
| Fat | 7.01 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 237% more |
| Sodium | 45 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 55% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
| Iron | 2.24 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 215% more |
| Potassium | 183 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.