Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked vs Bananas, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Bananas, raw
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked | Bananas, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 596 kcal | 89 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 570% more |
| Protein | 8.53 g ★ | 1.09 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 683% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 22.84 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Fat | 62.44 g | 0.33 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 18821% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 12.23 g | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sodium | 52 mg | 1 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 5100% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg ★ | 5 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 20% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg ★ | 0.26 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 435% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 8.7 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Potassium | 198 mg | 358 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.