Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 596 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 305% more |
| Protein | 8.53 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 72% more |
| Fat | 62.44 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 2902% more |
| Sodium | 52 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 47% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 96% more |
| Potassium | 198 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.