Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 287 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted has 88% more |
| Protein | 21.45 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Carbs | 0.05 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted has 0% more |
| Fat | 22.33 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted has 323% more |
| Sodium | 61 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 32% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 1.33 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted has 196% more |
| Potassium | 305 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.