Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted
3 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 199 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 35% more |
| Protein | 25.14 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 17% more |
| Fat | 10.91 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 425% more |
| Sodium | 65 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 34% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
| Iron | 1.38 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 94% more |
| Potassium | 337 mg ★ | 249 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 35% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.