Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 674 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 308% more |
| Protein | 5.24 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 83% more |
| Carbs | 0.62 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 0% more |
| Fat | 72.28 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 1925% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 42% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 60% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Potassium | 164 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.