Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Egg, whole, raw, fresh
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Egg, whole, raw, fresh
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Egg, whole, raw, fresh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 674 kcal | 143 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 371% more |
| Protein | 5.24 g | 12.56 g ★ | Egg, whole, raw, fresh has 58% more |
| Carbs | 0.62 g | 0.72 g ★ | Egg, whole, raw, fresh has 14% more |
| Fat | 72.28 g | 9.51 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 660% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.37 g | Egg, whole, raw, fresh has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg ★ | 142 mg | Egg, whole, raw, fresh has 70% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 56 mg ★ | Egg, whole, raw, fresh has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 1.75 mg ★ | Egg, whole, raw, fresh has 60% more |
| Potassium | 164 mg ★ | 138 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.