Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Bananas, raw
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Bananas, raw
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Bananas, raw | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 703 kcal | 89 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 690% more |
| Protein | 3.87 g ★ | 1.09 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 255% more |
| Carbs | 0.55 g | 22.84 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 98% more |
| Fat | 76.16 g | 0.33 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 22979% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 12.23 g | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg | 1 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 2700% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 5 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 40% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg ★ | 0.26 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 81% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 8.7 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 100% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 358 mg ★ | Bananas, raw has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.