Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
5 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 703 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 441% more |
| Protein | 3.87 g ★ | 2.69 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 44% more |
| Carbs | 0.55 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 98% more |
| Fat | 76.16 g | 0.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 27100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.05 g | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg ★ | 382 mg | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 93% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 10 mg ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 70% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 135% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg ★ | 35 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 166% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.