Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 703 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 378% more |
| Protein | 3.87 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 87% more |
| Carbs | 0.55 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 76.16 g | 2.08 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 3562% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 72% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 67% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 0.71 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 34% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.