Luxury loaf, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Luxury loaf, pork
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Luxury loaf, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Luxury loaf, pork has 57% more |
| Protein | 18.4 g ★ | 2.01 g | Luxury loaf, pork has 815% more |
| Carbs | 4.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Luxury loaf, pork has 3100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1225 mg | 36 mg ★ | Luxury loaf, pork has 3303% more |
| Calcium | 36 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Iron | 1.05 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Luxury loaf, pork has 52% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 377 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.