Marmalade, orange vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Marmalade, orange
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Marmalade, orange | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 246 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Marmalade, orange has 173% more |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Carbs | 66.3 g ★ | 20.71 g | Marmalade, orange has 220% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Sugar | 60 g | 6.48 g ★ | Marmalade, orange has 826% more |
| Sodium | 56 mg | 36 mg ★ | Marmalade, orange has 56% more |
| Calcium | 38 mg ★ | 38 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 0.15 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Vitamin C | 4.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Potassium | 37 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.