Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 44% more |
| Protein | 11.7 g ★ | 4.4 g | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) has 166% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 1.92 g ★ | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) has 15% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 53 mg ★ | 17 mg | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) has 212% more |
| Iron | 20.7 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) has 1289% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.