Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native)
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Protein | 11.7 g ★ | 2.01 g | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) has 482% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) has 1367% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 53 mg ★ | 38 mg | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) has 39% more |
| Iron | 20.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Oopah (tunicate), whole animal (Alaska Native) has 2900% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.