Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 504 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced has 460% more |
| Protein | 19.25 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced has 858% more |
| Carbs | 1.18 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Fat | 46.28 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced has 30753% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1582 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced has 4294% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Iron | 1.33 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pepperoni, beef and pork, sliced has 93% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 274 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.