Pimento, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pimento, canned
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Pimento, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 23 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Carbs | 5.1 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pimento, canned has 100% more |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Sugar | 2.71 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sodium | 14 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 1.68 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pimento, canned has 143% more |
| Vitamin C | 84.9 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Pimento, canned has 333% more |
| Potassium | 158 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.