Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, cooked, pan-broiled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, cooked, pan-broiled
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, cooked, pan-broiled Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 301 kcal 90 kcal Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, cooked, pan-broiled has 234% more
Protein 27.14 g 2.01 g Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, cooked, pan-broiled has 1250% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 21.39 g 0.15 g Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, cooked, pan-broiled has 14160% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 89 mg 36 mg Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, cooked, pan-broiled has 147% more
Calcium 20 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more
Iron 1.16 mg 0.69 mg Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, cooked, pan-broiled has 68% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 345 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.