Pork, ground, 96% lean / 4% fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, ground, 96% lean / 4% fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, ground, 96% lean / 4% fat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 121 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, ground, 96% lean / 4% fat, raw has 34% more |
| Protein | 21.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, ground, 96% lean / 4% fat, raw has 950% more |
| Carbs | 0.21 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Fat | 4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, ground, 96% lean / 4% fat, raw has 2567% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, ground, 96% lean / 4% fat, raw has 86% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 0.86 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, ground, 96% lean / 4% fat, raw has 25% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 310 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 35% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.